Such cases illustrate how celebrity backing can translate into tangible political gains.Negative examples abound as well, such as Donald Trump’s rise from reality TV star to president, which some critics argue exemplifies the dangers of celebrity politics eroding democratic norms. His celebrity status arguably prioritized spectacle over substance, contributing to polarized governance.Social media has exacerbated these dynamics, allowing celebrities to bypass traditional gatekeepers and speak directly to millions.
Platforms like X (formerly Twitter) enable rapid dissemination of views, but also invite instant criticism and misinformation spread. The impact on democracy is mixed; while celebrity involvement can democratize access to information, it might also undermine trust in experts by elevating unqualified voices. This economic pressure encourages some to remain apolitical to preserve marketability.Yet, in an age of activism, many fans demand transparency on social issues, viewing celebrity silence as moral failure.
